tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8381613.post113313847324347987..comments2023-04-03T19:10:54.088-04:00Comments on Critiques Of Libertarianism: For Mises' SakeMike Hubenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01371469964446567690noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8381613.post-1157672738981973802006-09-07T19:45:00.000-04:002006-09-07T19:45:00.000-04:00Hoppes' critique of Hayek is actually powerful and...Hoppes' critique of Hayek is actually powerful and ultimately true.Econoclasta ecuatorianohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13311023423834563634noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8381613.post-1134329464103885032005-12-11T14:31:00.000-05:002005-12-11T14:31:00.000-05:00I wonder why, if monarchies supply better governme...I wonder why, if monarchies supply better government than democracies, Hoppe didn't try to migrate to a country like Saudi Arabia, Swaziland or Brunei?Mark Plushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03859046131830902921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8381613.post-1133189050141645292005-11-28T09:44:00.000-05:002005-11-28T09:44:00.000-05:00Well, you can put the following excerpt, where Hop...Well, you can put the following excerpt, where Hoppe attacks Hayek's knowledge problem.<BR/><BR/><BR/>"Hayek's solution is not private property, but the decentralization of the use of knowledge.<BR/>Yet this is surely an absurd thesis. First, if the centralized use of knowledge is the problem, then it is difficult to explain why there are families, clubs, and firms, or why they do not face the<BR/>very same problems as socialism. Families and firms also involve central planning. The family head and the owner of the firm also make plans which bind the use other people can make of their private knowledge, yet families and firms are not known to share the problems of socialism."<BR/><BR/>http://www.mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/rae9_1_13.pdf<BR/><BR/>FernandoEl Gato con Bolashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06911633577845586115noreply@blogger.com